Clash of the mufti as liberals battle hardliners
BTN: Mohd Asri Zainal Abidin indeed has brought light to other races here in Malaysia with regards to the understanding of Islam. This is the form of Islam that will change many people's perceptions of its teaching.
Love and peace is the essence of all religion, and it's about time someone here in Malaysia preach Islam as it should be taught. I'm sure that if this happened, there will be many followers of this religion from the other races.
ANU: When will Harussani Zakaria be charged? He has told lies - such as about the number of Malays who have converted and about Azhar Mansor converting Malays. He should be the one charged.
Lucia: If all muftis in Malaysia were like Asri, who knows, I might consider joining Islam. His preaching is that of real Islam. He can maks non-Muslims understand Islam. I admire him very, very much.
Many people still remember the infamous incident at the Ipoh church where hundreds of Muslim gathered, thinking the church was converting Muslim into Christianity - all because of Harussani Zakaria. Yet, he has not been charged at all.
Some of you ought to remember his statements on a video where he said the Chinese will take over Malaysia. How on earth can he be a mufti? I hope to Allah that Asri will not be found guilty and sent to jail.
Tell the Truth: Harussani says under Asri's brand of Islam, Malaysia would be like Pakistan. The truth is that under Harussani's brand of Islam, Malaysia will be another Pakistan. Dishing out punishments for the smallest issues is exactly what Pakistan's Islam is all about. No need to rationalise, just whack. How is this different from Harussani's brand of Islam?
RR: It is the conservatives who cause the divisions in any religion, because they cannot see eye-to-eye with the progressives and the moderates, the latter being young and larger in numbers who will go their separate ways and cause the division as in Pakistan or elsewhere. The moderates must speak up, such as Dr Chandra Muzaffar has done, to advocate change.
Joe Friday: I've always wondered how Harussani can be kept as the Perak state mufti by the sultan given his outdated conservative views. Isn't it time that someone with a more balanced view on modern Islam be chosen instead?
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
JUDI DAH JADI HALAL DI MALAYSIA
Sports betting legalised despite Islamic concerns
Malaysia has legalised sports betting, a move supporters claim will curb illegal gambling and boost government coffers, but has raised the ire of Muslim and consumer groups.
COMMENTS:
Disgusted Legal gambling will truely rolled in huge income to the Government.. this is illigal money according to Islam and Christians. But when it is in Government coffer the majority of the illigal money will be used to make suraus, masjids, sk, smk Agama and all islamic activities. How can the dirty, illigal money become halal money once it is in government coffers?.. something must be not right...
Saturday, April 10, 2010
DATUKSHIP MADE IN PAHANG
org dolu2 masa zaman2 kesultanan tanah melayu, pangkat dan darjah kebesaran diberikan kpd yg berjasa kepada negara.cthnyer pahlawan yg mempertahankan negara. La ni yg artis2 yg menghiburkan negara. Patutnya darjah2 kebesaran ni diperuntukkan kpd askar2 yg byk berjasa, polis2 (berjasa shj), org perseorangan yg sanggup bergolok gadai harta bende menyara anak2 yatim, mcm sorang laki bini tu yg bela ramai anak yatim pakai duit sendiri. Aku lupa dah sapa nama dia.Dia ni sultan x tgk, yg diutamakan artis2, businesman, ahli politik dan suku sakat mereka. Rakyat marhem yg betul2 layak hanya melopong
motip ameng pun dpt... bukan ker mamat neh ada kantoi dadah pelbagai???
mencekik dadah banyak2 pun boleh dpt darjah kat apahng neh...
bila baca je tajuk topik, trus bleh agak sultan mana yg bagi ..
tengok buletin tadi...si Ameng yg dapat pingat ni kena tahan polis...
Ameng ditahan polis kes ugut bekas isteri
2010/04/06
KUALA LUMPUR: Bekas penyanyi utama Spring, Ameng ditahan polis berhubung kes ugutan terhadap bekas isterinya, selain ujian air kencingnya didapati positif dadah.
source: berita harian
I THINK BETTER BG DATUK KAT KARTIKA,,:sleepy:
apsal bapak aku tak g pun masa ni???
Ameng ditahan polis kes ugut bekas isteri
2010/04/06
KUALA LUMPUR: Bekas penyanyi utama Spring, Ameng ditahan polis berhubung kes ugutan terhadap bekas isterinya, selain ujian air kencingnya did ...
alahai Post at 6-4-2010 20:55
mmg betul lah ya ameng yang kena tahan tadi...
pingat kena tarik baik ke???
knape skrng nie byk artis dpt pangkat datuk.apa sumbangan diaorg kepada malaysia.
Logged 
.
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
KETUANAN MELAKA
Ketuanan Malacca
Tuesday, 30 March 2010 admin-s
So, in essence, all of Malaya belonged to Indonesia!!! And they all used Chinese money!! And they were all Hindu!!
By John Doe
A few friends from Malaysia emailed me and expressed surprised that Malacca minted their own coins. Yes they did. Let's see how Ketuanan Malacca held up.
Apparently, the coins were made between 1446-1459. They were minted from tin. Supposedly during the rule of Sultan Muzaffar (4th Sultan). However (for those who read Jawi) the inscriptions read “Al Sultan, Al Adil”, which literally translates to The Sultan, The Just (fair). And since it does not actually bear an inscribed year on it, the actual Sultan who made this could be anyone's guess. I was however going by “popular belief”, when I mentioned that it was the 4th Sultan's currency.
The coins look like this:
This must be magnificent, right? Proof of Ketuanan, right? Immediate questions arise!! Why were these coins not minted till the collapse of Malacca? And why wern't coins manufactured before the 4th Sultan? The answer is relatively easy once you look at a time-line. The Ketuanan Malacca was in reality, using Chinese coins. In fact, the use of Chinese coins had already been well established since the year 1300 (more than 100 years before Parameswara) by the Majapahit Empire. They were called “Kepeng”. And were authentic Chinese Currency.
(verified by Indonesian Ancient Relics Conservation Bureau)
This is also a very well established fact which is strangely “missing” from Malaysian History Textbooks. It becomes no surprise then that Parameswara only recognized the Chinese Money called “Kepeng”, and continued its' use when he set up shop in Malacca. His miniscule hamlet was simply NO MATCH for the Great Majapahit, or Pasai Kingdoms. Not to mention that it would have been dumb to try to start a new currency with only 30 men in his entire empire. (Excluding himself, the 29 others were Bugis Pirate-Mercenaries whom he hired.)
Enter Zheng Ho. Yes. Zheng Ho lived from 1371-1435. He was already in the area during the time of Majapahit, and before the start of Kampong Malacca. (30 people qualifies as a kampong, right?)
Raise your hands, all those who know that to help “legitimize” Malacca, the Sultans actually manufactured CHINESE COINS WITH Zheng Ho's name on it?
Called “Zheng Ho Yan Pau”. They were THE currency of Malacca!
A nicely framed Display of the Zheng Ho Tin-Coins Collection.
Ketuanan Malacca was solely using Cheng Ho Money!!
And here's a closer view of some surviving coins:
I am reliably informed that the Chinese Kanji reads as Xing Yuan Tong Shi Yi.
To add to all this hidden History, one must know that China occupied Vietnam for over 1,000 years. Thus making all of Indochine part of China itself. Hence, the name (old) Yunan included all of IndoChina. According to the book of Nagarakertagama (1365) pupuh (canto) XIII and XIV mentioned several states in Sumatra, Malay Peninsula, Borneo, Sulawesi, Nusa Tenggara islands, Maluku, New Guinea, and some parts of Philippines islands as under Majapahit realm of power. This source mentioned of Majapahit expansions has marked the greatest extent of Majapahit empire.
So, in essence, all of Malaya belonged to Indonesia!!! And they all used Chinese money!! And they were all Hindu!! Ok. some were Buddhist, and most were continuously flipping from Hinduism to Buddhism, and vice versa. Take Prambanan (Hindu) in comparison to Borrobudor (Buddhist). Both were on the same island of Java, merely 20 miles from each other. And just like Angkor, they kept flipping from Buddhism to Hinduism, and vice versa. What a completely different world !!
And since all these Keris-weilding people swear that Allah chiselled Article 153 in stone, then by definition NONE of all who lived in Southeast Asia was a “malay”!! Simply because NONE were Muslim at all!! Based on the same logic, then, exactly what Ketuanan are they ranting about? Since during the time of Parameswara, there were CLEARLY NO “malays” at all as per defined by Article 153!!
So, for those who define “malay” by Article 153, then the best-case scenario, is that the “birth of malays” began when the Gujeratis' brought Islam over to Acheh. Which is circa 10th Century. This makes the “malays” 600 years old. Otherwise, if you prefer a “longer/older” history, then the First Austronesians emerged as a result of Mongoloid and Dravidic marriage (Chindian) somewhere in Taiwan or a long the China Coast of Amoy. And that History my friend, puts the entire Austronesian origins at around 6,000 yrs old. There is no need for arguing with me. Let your DNA do the talking. Your Mitochindiral Markers are for all to see. And they never lie!!
So what exactly is all this Ketuanan about? Is it about Lordship? Is it about Superiority? Is it about pride?
Google “The Pride of the Malay Race”, and you will end up with Dr. Jose Rizal. Strange isn't it? He is also known as “The Greatest Malay Hero”. Who was he? He was born in 1861 in the city of Calamba, in Laguna province, as the seventh of eleven siblings. At such an early age, he already demonstrated superb intellect. He went on study at notable schools of the time, such as Ateneo Municipal de Manila (now the Ateneo de Manila University) and the University of Santo Tomas, where he excelled both in academic and athletics. After that, he went to Madrid to study medicine. He lived in Europe for quite a time, trying to convince the Spanish government to initiate reforms in the colony and further enriching his knowledge.
Aside from being a doctor, Rizal was also a sculptor, a a writer, a scientist, a poet, and a polyglot who knew how to speak at least ten languages. His main contribution to the literary (and political) world was his two novels, the Noli Me Tangere and the El Filibusterismo. Both books which I bought while I was in Manila. By far, he seems to have more “Ketuanan” than any UMNO I know.
Have a look at the comparison between Malaysian Parliament and Singapore Parliament members:
PM Lee Hsien Loong
Cambridge University - First Class Honours (1974)
Harvard University - Masters (1980)
PM Dato’ Sri Najib Razak
University of Nottingham - Bachelor of Arts Honours (1974)
Former PM Abdullah bin Haji Ahmad Badawi
University of Malaya - Bachelor of Arts Honours (1964)
Former PM Goh Chok Tong
University of Singapore - First Class Honours (1964)
Williams College , USA - Masters (1967)
MM Lee Kuan Yew
Cambridge University - First Class Honours (1949)
Former Minister of Foregn Affairs Syed Hamid Albar
(can someone tell me his univeristy?) - Bachelor of Arts [UITM]
The list goes on....
So for those who still insist on “Ketuanan Malacca” now, take a good hard look at this map. Notice how land is labelled.
Try looking for “Tanah Melayu”. Can't find it? SURPRISE !! But I'm sure you will notice Malacca. You will also notice Borneo, Sumatera, Celebes, Mindanao, and Java. And what is my point? There was never a Kingdom of Borneo, Sumatera, Celebes, Mindanao, nor Java. They were simply reference names to the land. Malacca happened to share the same name as the land on which it resided. Whichever the case, “Tanah Melayu” was definitely NOT it's original name.
Coming back to the Ketuanan issue now. How much Ketuanan did this Migrant Murderer Prince actually have? (He did murder the brother in-law of Sultan of Pattani). And is anyone going to stress the Kelantan, Perlis, Kedah and Terengganu Royalty migrating from Thailand? Or the Sultan of Selangor who migrated from Sulawesi? (Nephew of Daeng Kemboja) How about the Sultan of Johor, who “took over” after the original bloodline of Parameswara was killed? The new line is Bugis, if memory serves me well. He was then Bendehara of the dead Sultan.
What if History books read this way ...
“The Malayan Peninsular was first Colonized in 1402 by an Indonesian migrant called Parameswara?”
Does he not fit the description? If someone were to jump on a boat from Palembang today, Malaysia would lock him up in Jail, and call him a “Pendatang Haram” isn't it?
So why wasn't Parameswara called a Pendatang Haram when he first came to Malaya?
Instead, he was transformed into a pseudo-Hero?
After all, Parameswara was a Criminal, and there were already 2 death sentences against him. One, decreed by his own father, and the second was by the King of Siam. (His third death-sentence came much later from Acheh.) Somehow “Pengkhianat dan Pembunuh” comes to mind to describe Parameswara. Not to mention the driving away of all the Orang Asli's from their land; of which they had already lived for 60,000 years!!!
So it is very evident that this “Ketuanan Malacca” is simply a creation of overzealous Nationalists, who distort it, and create a “Myth” about a non-existant Ketuanan. UMNO is NOT a descendant of Parameswara. Most are cross-breeds from goodness-knows-where. At best, they share the same island of Palembang. Which makes them Sumatran. Which confirms that they are as “pendatang” as everyone else.
So Perkasa, please take your 67% Ketuanan and stuff it up where the sun don't shine, as someone so quaintly phrased it.
Sunday, March 21, 2010
SATU HARI NANTI SEMUA RAKYAT MALAYSIA JADI ANAK HARAM
| 47 Anak Luar Nikah DiLahirkan Setiap Hari Di Malaysia Posted on Sunday, March 21 @ 00:00:00 PDT Dilulus untuk paparan oleh teori |
Oleh: sofiwahab"
Seramai 17,303 anak luar nikah Melayu atau tidak sah taraf didaftarkan di seluruh negara sepanjang tahun lalu. Ini bermakna secara puratanya 47 orang anak luar nikah dilahirkan tiap-tiap hari di negara kita. Jadi negara kita sekarang berada dihuni oleh golongan penzina yang berkeliaran di mana-mana.Malangnya kerajaan BN yang memerintahkan Malaysia sekarang memandang kes ini sebagai kes remeh temeh sebab itu tiada tindakan drastik dan komited dilakukan untuk membenteras perkara ini.
Angka ini juga menunjukkan bahawa gejala perzinaan ini sudah sampai ke tahap kronik sehingga melahirkan 17,303 bayi luar nikah tahun lepas. Bayangkan berapa banyak perzinaan yang berlaku yang tidak menyebabkan penzina perempuan mengandung.
Tidak ada cara lain untuk membasmi gejala maksiat zina ini melainkan kerajaan mengamalkan amar makhruf nahi mungkar. Tetapi ianya sudah pasti tidak akan dilakukan oleh kerajaan BN. Jadi untuk itu rakyat mesti menukar kerajaan yang ada sekarang dengan kerajaan PR yang Insya Allah akan berusaha bersungguh-sungguh untuk menyelesaikan masalah ini.
Dalam media hari ini Ketua Pengarah Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara (JPN), Datuk Alwi Ibrahim, berkata bilangan itu meningkat 762 kes berbanding tahun sebelumnya. Pada 2008 seramai 16,541 anak luar nikah didaftarkan di JPN manakala pada 2007 seramai 16,100 orang. tahun lalu, JPN mencatatkan 74,723 pendaftaran anak luar nikah adalah membabitkan orang Melayu/Islam.
Ini tidak termasuk kes buang bayi yang dilaporkan kepada Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat (JKM). “Sepanjang tempoh ini, 214,033 bayi pelbagai bangsa didaftarkan dengan status anak tidak sah taraf, termasuk kes anak yang tidak berbapa 104,834 orang dan 109,199 orang mengikut Seksyen 13, Akta Pendaftaran Kelahiran dan Kematian 1957 (Akta 299),” katanya kepada media.
Artikel lain di http://mutaligat.blogspot.com
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
YET FURTHER RESPONSE TO TUN MAHAFIRAUN'S THOUGHTS
IN RESPONSE TO TUN MAHAFIRAUN'S WRITE-UP
By majapil
on January 5, 2010 1:25 PM
on January 5, 2010 1:25 PM Salam Tun,
(TUJUAN SAYA MEMBERI KOMEN DILAMAN WEB TUN HANYALAH INGIN MEMBINA KEHARMONIAN BERAGAMA DIMALAYSIA)
Merujuk pada penerangan Tun:-
5. Sebenarnya kalimah "Allah" tidak terdapat dalam kitab Taurat atau Talmud Hebrew atau kitab Injil Kristian dalam bahasa Latin, Greek atau bahasa-bahasa Eropah. Nama bagi Tuhan dalam bahasa yahudi ialah "Yahweh", yang diterjemahkan kepada bahasa Inggeris sebagai "Jehovah".
KOMEN SAYA: Memang benar kalimah "Allah"tidak terdapat dlm kitab Taurat/Talmud Hebrew/Kitab Injil dlm bahasa Latin,kerana perkataan "Allah"berasal atau berasa daripada bahasa Arab.Tetapi perkataan "Allah"memang ADA dalam kitab Injil bahasa Arabic yang digunakan secara berleluasa ditanah Arab dikalangan bangsa arab yang menganut agama kristian.Negara Indonesia(Negara Islam terbesar didunia)melalui LEMBAGA ALKITAB INDONESIA -ingin menerbitkan terjemahan Bible/Kitab Injil/Taurat kedalam bahasa Indonesia telah menterjemahkan perkataan "God"(English)/"Allaah"(Arabic) telah memilih "Allah"sebagai perkatan yang tepat untuk "God/Allaah"-Pada Zaman british lagi rakyat diNegeri sabah dan sarawak terutama kaum bumiputra yang beragama Kristian telah menggunakan kitab terjemahan bahasa Indonesia dan menggunakan nama "Allah"dalam bahasa Malaysia dalam acara sembayang minggu mereka.Saya amat heran kerana diIndonesia,tidak ada timbul kontroversi tentang penggunaan kata "Allah"dan dibenarkan oleh kerajaan Indonesia untuk orang kristian.
(TUN MENULIS)
6. Dalam kitab Injil, Jesus (Isa) dan God adalah sama. Tidak ada kalimah Allah dalam kitab Injil dalam bahasa-bahasa yang disebut di atas.
JAWAPAN SAYA:Dalam kitab Injil (versi?English?versi Bahasa Indonesia?)Jesus(Isa)memang "God"yang menjelma menjadi manusia.Dalam kitab Injil versi bahasa Indonesia memang ada kalimah "Allah"
contoh :Injil yohanes 1:1 "Pada mulanya adalah Firman;Firman itu bersama-sama dengan Allah dan Firman itu adalah Allah"
Injil Yohanes 1:14"Firman itu telah menjadi manusia,dan diam diantara kita,dan kita telah melihat kemuliaanNya..."(Alkitab terbitan Lembaga Alkitab Indonesia(2006)
(TUN MENULIS)
8. Mungkin juga kalimah "Allah" dapat menyamakan agama Kristian dengan agama Islam kerana menyembah Tuhan yang sama. Dengan ini penerimaan agama Kristian oleh orang Islam boleh jadi lebih mudah. Terjemahan ini salah. Sepatutnya perkataan "Tuhan" digunakan untuk God.
JAWAPAN SAYA: Terjemahan ini tidak salah,Yang Berbahagia TUN.Sebab memang terjemahan "God"dalam bahasa Arab dan bahasa Indonesia ialah "Allah"manakala "Tuhan" ialah terjemahan dari perkataan "Lord/LORD(Yahweh).
Jika demikianlah terjemahan yg Tun maksudkan..maka agak pelik jika kita petik terjemahannya seperti terejemahan bahasa English,misal ayat dalam Kitab Injil Matthew yg berbunyi "....You shall worship the LORD(Tuhan) your GOD(Tuhanmu???),and Him only you shall serve". LORD (Tuhan) dan GOD ialah dua perkataan yang tak sama...terjemahan yg tepat ialah LORD -Tuhan dan GOD -Allah.
(TUN MENULIS)
9. Tetapi dalam agama Kristian terdapat konsep "Trinity" yang mana terdapat "God the Father, God the Son and the Holy Ghost". Jika dalam bahasa Melayu terdapat dalam kitab Injil atau syarahan berkenaan "Allah sebagai Bapak, Allah sebagai Anak dan Roh yang Suci", maka tentulah ini akan ditentang oleh orang Islam. Dalam Islam Allah tidak ada bapak, tidak ada anak. Ia tidak dilahirkan dan Ia tidak melahirkan sesiapa. Allah hanya satu. Ia tidak boleh disekutu dengan sesiapa.
SAYA MENJAWAP:Maaf TUN,pemahaman TUN tentang konsep "Trinity"atau "Tritunggal"tak dalam.Agama kristian tetap percaya Allah hanya SATU yang menyatakan diriNya dalam tiga oknum (Bapa,Anak dan Roh Kudus).Sama seperti manusia yg diciptakan menurut gambar dan rupa TUHAN .Manusia mempunyai (1)TUBUH (2) JIWA (3) ROH -manusia ialah mahkluk 'Tritunggal' TIGA DLM SATU sama seperti TUHAN ALLAH itu tritunggal (Bapa,Anak (Jesus) dan Roh Kudus).Contoh lain ialah AIR.Air hanya satu tetapi kandungan molikiulnya TIGA (H2O-2 Hidrogen dan 1 oksigen)untuk menjadi Air.
Dalam Kristian Allah itu bapa(pencipta)kami,bukannya Allah itu berbapa,dan bukan melahirkan melainkan mengambil bentuk,menjelma menjadi manusia dalam Jesus.
(TUN MENULIS)
11. Di Semenanjung Malaysia kita tidak pernah mendengar orang Kristian menggunakan kalimah "Allah" apabila bercakap berkenaan God dalam bahasa Melayu. Kenapa pula kita sekarang akan mengguna kalimah ini?
JAWAPAN SAYA:Kalimah "Allah"amat berleluasa digunakan diMalaysia Timur Sabah/Sarawak terutamanya sembayang hari minggu digereja-gereja yang gunakan bahasa Malaysia walaupun jarang kedengaran disemenanjung Malaysia.Disemenanjung Malaysia,majoriti Gerejanya ialah bersembayang dalam bahasa English,Chinese dan Tamil maka memang kalimah "Allah"jarang atau tidak disebut langsung kerana masyarakat Kristian hanyalah terdiri dari kaum cina dan India.Sejak zaman british,rakyat sabah/sarawak yang beragama Kristian menggunakan kalimah "Allah"dalam bahasa melayu tanpa ada kontroversi dan ini bukanlah baru dipraktekkan sekarang melainkan sudah ratusan tahun dipakai guna.
Saya kira bila agama dipolitikkan demi mencapai agenda masing2,sudah pastilah akan menimbulkan ketegangan.Saya harap pihak kerajaan akan berlaku adil memandang rakyat sabah/Sarawak telah buktikan sokongan padunya (99%)terhadap kerajaan BN dibandingkan dengan negeri lain.
By on January 5, 2010 10:00 PM
on January 5, 2010 10:00 PM Kepada majapil,
(TUN MENULIS)
9. Tetapi dalam agama Kristian terdapat konsep "Trinity" yang mana terdapat "God the Father, God the Son and the Holy Ghost". Jika dalam bahasa Melayu terdapat dalam kitab Injil atau syarahan berkenaan "Allah sebagai Bapak, Allah sebagai Anak dan Roh yang Suci", maka tentulah ini akan ditentang oleh orang Islam. Dalam Islam Allah tidak ada bapak, tidak ada anak. Ia tidak dilahirkan dan Ia tidak melahirkan sesiapa. Allah hanya satu. Ia tidak boleh disekutu dengan sesiapa.
SAYA MENJAWAP:Maaf TUN,pemahaman TUN tentang konsep "Trinity"atau "Tritunggal"tak dalam.Agama kristian tetap percaya Allah hanya SATU yang menyatakan diriNya dalam tiga oknum (Bapa,Anak dan Roh Kudus).Sama seperti manusia yg diciptakan menurut gambar dan rupa TUHAN .Manusia mempunyai (1)TUBUH (2) JIWA (3) ROH -manusia ialah mahkluk 'Tritunggal' TIGA DLM SATU sama seperti TUHAN ALLAH itu tritunggal (Bapa,Anak (Jesus) dan Roh Kudus).Contoh lain ialah AIR.Air hanya satu tetapi kandungan molikiulnya TIGA (H2O-2 Hidrogen dan 1 oksigen)untuk menjadi Air.
Dalam Kristian Allah itu bapa(pencipta)kami,bukannya Allah itu berbapa,dan bukan melahirkan melainkan mengambil bentuk,menjelma menjadi manusia dalam Jesus.
Inilah perbezaan yang jelas antara Muslim dengan Kristian.Makna Allah telah dijelaskan oleh Allah sendiri dalam surah Al-Ikhlas.Saudara telah tertinggal ayat ini ' Ia tidak boleh disekutu dengan sesiapa ' Dengan mengambil contoh 'air' terdiri dua unsur iaitu 2 Hidrogen dan 1 Oksigen telah menyamakan makhluk dengan Allah dan Allah itu ada sekutunya seperti hidrogen dan oksigen bersekutu baru boleh jadi air.Ini bertentangan dengan Islam kerana Allah tiada siapa yang menyerupainya dan tidak ada sekutu bagiNya.Allah tidak berkehendak pada makhluk tetapi makhluklah yang berkehendak kepadaNya.Tiada satu benda pun yang menyamai dan menyerupai Allah,tiada terfikir dan terlintas dihati manusia bagaimana rupa Allah.Allah Mahaberkuasa tidak perlu kepada sesiapa.Allah yang menjadikan Isa tanpa bapa seperti Adam tanpa bapa dan ibu, Hawa dijadikan daripada tulang rusuk Adam juga tanpa bapa dan ibu.
Adam dari tanah hitam yang kering dan keturunannya yang lain ,dari air mani sampai ke Isa , Ibunya Maryam mengandung tanpa disentuh lelaki dan lahirlah Isa.Inilah 4 kaedah lahirnya manusia ,3 daripadanya hanya khusus untuk Adam,Hawa dan Isa dan cara ke 4 itu percampuran benih lelaki dengan perempuan maka lahirlah keturunan manusia seperti anak-anak Adam dengan Hawa iaitu Qabil dan Habil.Di dalam Al-Quran semua nabi-nabi dari Adam,Nuh,Ibrahim,Luth,Ismail,Ishak,Yaakub,Yusuf,Syuaib,Musa,Daud,Sulaiman,Zakaria,Yahya,Isa dan nabi-nabi yang lain semuanya mengaku MUSLIM sebelum kedatangan nabi Muhammad dan kitab Al-Quran diturunkan.Agama nabi Ibrahim ialah Islam.Taurat,Zabur dan Injil diturankan selepas kewafatan Ibrahim.Al-Quran kepada Muhammad.
Pendustaan besar Kristian dan Yahudi yang mengatakan mereka mengikut agama dan Tuhan nabi Ibrahim.
RESPOND TO TUN MAHAFIRAUN'S WRITE-UP
ALLAH IS THE GOD FOR ALL MANKIND
By on January 7, 2010 12:17 PM
on January 7, 2010 12:17 PM Salamunalaykum Tun and others.
Malaysian Muslims thought that the word “ALLAH” is exclusive for them and it exclusively refers to the god of the Muslims. Whether the Malaysian Muslims like it or not, these are facts about the word ALLAH :-
1. Perkataan ALLAH digunakan juga oleh orang-orang yang menolak ajaran Nabi Muhammad [6:91].
2. Perkataan ALLAH digunakan juga oleh orang-orang Kristian Arab dari sebelum Nabi Muhammad sehinggalah sekarang. Kita boleh membaca sendiri secara online Arabic Bible ini dan lihat sendiri perkataan “ALLAH” ini yang ditulis di dalam tulisan Arab.
3. Perkataan ALLAH digunakan juga oleh orang-orang Kristian Indonesia. Banyak program-program TV Kristian disiarkan di Indonesia sempena hari Natal. Kita boleh lihat pengunaan perkataan ALLAH di dalam program-program TV ini.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ft4Rp96jW0
3. ALLAH (di dalam bahasa Arab) = TUHAN (di dalam Bahasa Melayu) = GOD (di dalam bahasa English).
4. ALLAH bukannya nama khusus untuk tuhan orang-orang Islam. ALLAH adalah perkataan Arab bagi perkataan TUHAN. Sebab itulah orang-orang Arab yang menentang Nabi Muhammad [6:91] serta orang-orang Kristian Arab juga menggunakan perkataan ALLAH.
5. Penggunaan perkataan ALLAH bukanlah sesuatu yang eksklusif untuk orang-orang Islam sahaja. Sesiapa sahaja boleh menggunakan perkataan ALLAH. Pernah atau tidak Nabi Muhammad, Abu Bakar, Umar, Uthman dan Ali melarang orang-orang yang tidak mahu menerima Quran dan orang-orang Kristian Arab dari menggunakan perkataan ALLAH? Adakah kerajaan Mesir, kerajaan Iran serta kerajaan negara-negara Arab lain melarang rakyat mereka yang beragama Kristian daripada menggunakan perkataan ALLAH? Pernah atau tidak kerajaan Indonesia melarang rakyat mereka yg beragama Kristian daripada menggunakan perkataan ALLAH?
6. Memang benar perkataan “ALLAH” tidak terdapat di dalam kitab asal Taurat atau Injil kerana KITAB ASAL TAURAT DAN INJIL DITURUNKAN ATAU DITULIS DI DALAM BAHASA HEBREW DAN ARAMAIC, BUKANNYA DI DALAM BAHASA ARAB. Akan tetapi, perkataan “ALLAH” terdapat di dalam Old Testament dan New Testament yang telah diterjemahkan ke dalam Bahasa Arab. Perkataan “ALLAH” terdapat di dalam Quran kerana perkataan “ALLAH” ialah perkataan Arab dan Quran diturunkan atau ditulis didalam bahasa Arab. Orang-orang Kristian dan Yahudi yang bukan berbangsa Arab bertutur di dalam bahasa ibunda mereka sendiri dan mereka tidak menggunakan perkataan Arab "ALLAH" apabila mereka bertutur di dalam bahasa ibunda mereka, akan tetapi, perkataan "ALLAH" digunakan juga di dalam Quran apabila merujuk kepada pertuturan mereka. Ini adalah kerana Quran ditulis di dalam Bahasa Arab, oleh yang demikian perkataan Arab "ALLAH" (Arabic) digunakan bukannya "YAHWEH" (Hebrew) ataupun "ALAHA" (Aramaic). Contoh seperti di bawah :-
[6:91] THEY NEVER VALUE GOD AS HE SHOULD BE VALUED. Thus, THEY SAID, "GOD (ALLAH in Arabic text) does not reveal anything to any human being." Say, "Who then revealed the scripture that Moses brought, with light and guidance for the people?" You put it down on paper to proclaim it, while concealing a lot of it. You were taught what you never knew - you and your parents. Say, "GOD (is the One who revealed it)," then leave them in their heedlessness, playing.
[2:116] THEY (THE CHRISTIANS) SAID, "GOD (ALLAH in Arabic text) has begotten a son!" Be He glorified; never! To Him belongs everything in the heavens and the earth; all are subservient to Him.
[5:18] THE JEWS and the CHRISTIANS SAID, "We are GOD's (ALLAH in Arabic text) children and His beloved." Say, "Why then does He punish you for your sins? You are just humans like the other humans He created." He forgives whomever He wills and punishes whomever He wills. To ALLAH belongs the sovereignty of the heavens and the earth, and everything between them, and to Him is the final destiny.
[9:30] The JEWS said, "Ezra is the son of GOD (ALLAH in Arabic text)," while THE CHRISTIANS SAID, "Jesus is the son of GOD! (ALLAH in Arabic text)" These are blasphemies uttered by their mouths. They thus match the blasphemies of those who have disbelieved in the past. ALLAH condemns them. They have surely deviated.
[10:68] THEY (THE CHRISTIANS) SAID, "GOD (ALLAH in Arabic text) has begotten a son!" Be He glorified. He is the Most Rich. To Him belongs everything in the heavens and everything on earth. You have no proof to support such a blasphemy. Are you saying about GOD what you do not know?
God of the Arabic Bible is called "ALLAH". I do not think you believe that there is a god for the English Bible and another god for the Arabic Bible and a third for the Italian bible...etc. It would be too naive. There is only one GOD. His "name" in English is GOD, in French: UN DIEU, in Italian: DIO, in German: GOTT, in Spanish: DIOS, in Portuguese: DEUS, in Arabic: ALLAH, in Aramaic : ALAHA and in Malay : TUHAN.
All these are no more than the names of GOD in different languages. To this day the Christian Arabs pray to ALLAH and talk about ALLAH. They called Him ALLAH even before The Quran was revealed to Muhammad and they know they were not worshipping any moon god. Those who still speak Jesus language (Aramaic/syriac) call God ALAHA to this day like Jesus did. Jesus did not pray to a moon god but to ALAHA (ALLAH in Arabic), the One and Only God.
The Arabic Bible, use the word ALLAH for God.
If you want to verify it, call any Arabic church in the USA or any English speaking country and ask them what they call GOD in their Arabic Bible and whether they still use the word ALLAH in their Bible or not. You may even check it yourself from the online Arabic Bible.
Jewish Arabs also pray to ALLAH and talk about ALLAH just like an English person talks about GOD.
Apakah perasaan orang Islam apabila “God is dead” diganti dengan "Allah is dead"?
Bagaimanakah perasaan orang Islam apabila seseorang menyebut “God is dead”?
There is something wrong with the Muslims if they are sensitive when someone said “Allah is dead” but not sensitive when someone said “God is dead” as both have the same meaning and refer to the same GOD/TUHAN/ALLAH.
GOD bless.
WHEN SOME SAY "GOD IS DEAD" or "ALLAH IS DEAD" .... IS JUST THAT SOMETHING IS WRONG SOMEWHERE ..... FOR A TRUE BELIEVER IN GOD SHALL NEVER AND WILL NEVER UTTER THAT KIND OF PHRASE or UNBECOMING REMARKS.
BUT HOW CAN WE HUMANS SAY "GOD IS DEAD" or even "ALLAH IS DEAD" WHEN THOSE WHO BELIEVE IN GOD [ALLAH] SHOULD'VE KNOWN FULLY WELL THAT GOD [ALLAH] IS NEVER SIMILAR TO HIS CREATIONS .... AND GOD EXIST INFINITELY .....THUS GOD NEVER DIE - UNLIKE WE HUMANS (HIS CREATIONS) BORN TO LIVE AND DIE.
BEING A TRUE BELIEVER OF GOD [ALLAH] ..... EVERY HUMAN SHOULD KNOW THAT ONLY GOD [ALLAH] IS THE IMMORTAL ONE .... WHILE WE HUMANS OF HIS CREATIONS ARE JUST MERE MORTAL CREATURES OF GOD [ALLAH].
AND ONLY GOD THE ALMIGHTY - ALLAH.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)