Sunday, March 21, 2010

SATU HARI NANTI SEMUA RAKYAT MALAYSIA JADI ANAK HARAM

47 Anak Luar Nikah DiLahirkan Setiap Hari Di Malaysia
Posted on Sunday, March 21 @ 00:00:00 PDT
Dilulus untuk paparan oleh teori

Artikel Oleh: sofiwahab

"Seramai 17,303 anak luar nikah Melayu atau tidak sah taraf didaftarkan di seluruh negara sepanjang tahun lalu. Ini bermakna secara puratanya 47 orang anak luar nikah dilahirkan tiap-tiap hari di negara kita. Jadi negara kita sekarang berada dihuni oleh golongan penzina yang berkeliaran di mana-mana.



Malangnya kerajaan BN yang memerintahkan Malaysia sekarang memandang kes ini sebagai kes remeh temeh sebab itu tiada tindakan drastik dan komited dilakukan untuk membenteras perkara ini.

Angka ini juga menunjukkan bahawa gejala perzinaan ini sudah sampai ke tahap kronik sehingga melahirkan 17,303 bayi luar nikah tahun lepas. Bayangkan berapa banyak perzinaan yang berlaku yang tidak menyebabkan penzina perempuan mengandung.

Tidak ada cara lain untuk membasmi gejala maksiat zina ini melainkan kerajaan mengamalkan amar makhruf nahi mungkar. Tetapi ianya sudah pasti tidak akan dilakukan oleh kerajaan BN. Jadi untuk itu rakyat mesti menukar kerajaan yang ada sekarang dengan kerajaan PR yang Insya Allah akan berusaha bersungguh-sungguh untuk menyelesaikan masalah ini.

Dalam media hari ini Ketua Pengarah Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara (JPN), Datuk Alwi Ibrahim, berkata bilangan itu meningkat 762 kes berbanding tahun sebelumnya. Pada 2008 seramai 16,541 anak luar nikah didaftarkan di JPN manakala pada 2007 seramai 16,100 orang. tahun lalu, JPN mencatatkan 74,723 pendaftaran anak luar nikah adalah membabitkan orang Melayu/Islam.

Ini tidak termasuk kes buang bayi yang dilaporkan kepada Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat (JKM). “Sepanjang tempoh ini, 214,033 bayi pelbagai bangsa didaftarkan dengan status anak tidak sah taraf, termasuk kes anak yang tidak berbapa 104,834 orang dan 109,199 orang mengikut Seksyen 13, Akta Pendaftaran Kelahiran dan Kematian 1957 (Akta 299),” katanya kepada media.

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

YET FURTHER RESPONSE TO TUN MAHAFIRAUN'S THOUGHTS

IN RESPONSE TO TUN MAHAFIRAUN'S WRITE-UP

Salam Tun,
(TUJUAN SAYA MEMBERI KOMEN DILAMAN WEB TUN HANYALAH INGIN MEMBINA KEHARMONIAN BERAGAMA DIMALAYSIA)

Merujuk pada penerangan Tun:-

5. Sebenarnya kalimah "Allah" tidak terdapat dalam kitab Taurat atau Talmud Hebrew atau kitab Injil Kristian dalam bahasa Latin, Greek atau bahasa-bahasa Eropah. Nama bagi Tuhan dalam bahasa yahudi ialah "Yahweh", yang diterjemahkan kepada bahasa Inggeris sebagai "Jehovah".

KOMEN SAYA: Memang benar kalimah "Allah"tidak terdapat dlm kitab Taurat/Talmud Hebrew/Kitab Injil dlm bahasa Latin,kerana perkataan "Allah"berasal atau berasa daripada bahasa Arab.Tetapi perkataan "Allah"memang ADA dalam kitab Injil bahasa Arabic yang digunakan secara berleluasa ditanah Arab dikalangan bangsa arab yang menganut agama kristian.Negara Indonesia(Negara Islam terbesar didunia)melalui LEMBAGA ALKITAB INDONESIA -ingin menerbitkan terjemahan Bible/Kitab Injil/Taurat kedalam bahasa Indonesia telah menterjemahkan perkataan "God"(English)/"Allaah"(Arabic) telah memilih "Allah"sebagai perkatan yang tepat untuk "God/Allaah"-Pada Zaman british lagi rakyat diNegeri sabah dan sarawak terutama kaum bumiputra yang beragama Kristian telah menggunakan kitab terjemahan bahasa Indonesia dan menggunakan nama "Allah"dalam bahasa Malaysia dalam acara sembayang minggu mereka.Saya amat heran kerana diIndonesia,tidak ada timbul kontroversi tentang penggunaan kata "Allah"dan dibenarkan oleh kerajaan Indonesia untuk orang kristian.

(TUN MENULIS)
6. Dalam kitab Injil, Jesus (Isa) dan God adalah sama. Tidak ada kalimah Allah dalam kitab Injil dalam bahasa-bahasa yang disebut di atas.


JAWAPAN SAYA:Dalam kitab Injil (versi?English?versi Bahasa Indonesia?)Jesus(Isa)memang "God"yang menjelma menjadi manusia.Dalam kitab Injil versi bahasa Indonesia memang ada kalimah "Allah"
contoh :Injil yohanes 1:1 "Pada mulanya adalah Firman;Firman itu bersama-sama dengan Allah dan Firman itu adalah Allah"
Injil Yohanes 1:14"Firman itu telah menjadi manusia,dan diam diantara kita,dan kita telah melihat kemuliaanNya..."(Alkitab terbitan Lembaga Alkitab Indonesia(2006)

(TUN MENULIS)

8. Mungkin juga kalimah "Allah" dapat menyamakan agama Kristian dengan agama Islam kerana menyembah Tuhan yang sama. Dengan ini penerimaan agama Kristian oleh orang Islam boleh jadi lebih mudah. Terjemahan ini salah. Sepatutnya perkataan "Tuhan" digunakan untuk God.

JAWAPAN SAYA: Terjemahan ini tidak salah,Yang Berbahagia TUN.Sebab memang terjemahan "God"dalam bahasa Arab dan bahasa Indonesia ialah "Allah"manakala "Tuhan" ialah terjemahan dari perkataan "Lord/LORD(Yahweh).
Jika demikianlah terjemahan yg Tun maksudkan..maka agak pelik jika kita petik terjemahannya seperti terejemahan bahasa English,misal ayat dalam Kitab Injil Matthew yg berbunyi "....You shall worship the LORD(Tuhan) your GOD(Tuhanmu???),and Him only you shall serve". LORD (Tuhan) dan GOD ialah dua perkataan yang tak sama...terjemahan yg tepat ialah LORD -Tuhan dan GOD -Allah.

(TUN MENULIS)
9. Tetapi dalam agama Kristian terdapat konsep "Trinity" yang mana terdapat "God the Father, God the Son and the Holy Ghost". Jika dalam bahasa Melayu terdapat dalam kitab Injil atau syarahan berkenaan "Allah sebagai Bapak, Allah sebagai Anak dan Roh yang Suci", maka tentulah ini akan ditentang oleh orang Islam. Dalam Islam Allah tidak ada bapak, tidak ada anak. Ia tidak dilahirkan dan Ia tidak melahirkan sesiapa. Allah hanya satu. Ia tidak boleh disekutu dengan sesiapa.

SAYA MENJAWAP:Maaf TUN,pemahaman TUN tentang konsep "Trinity"atau "Tritunggal"tak dalam.Agama kristian tetap percaya Allah hanya SATU yang menyatakan diriNya dalam tiga oknum (Bapa,Anak dan Roh Kudus).Sama seperti manusia yg diciptakan menurut gambar dan rupa TUHAN .Manusia mempunyai (1)TUBUH (2) JIWA (3) ROH -manusia ialah mahkluk 'Tritunggal' TIGA DLM SATU sama seperti TUHAN ALLAH itu tritunggal (Bapa,Anak (Jesus) dan Roh Kudus).Contoh lain ialah AIR.Air hanya satu tetapi kandungan molikiulnya TIGA (H2O-2 Hidrogen dan 1 oksigen)untuk menjadi Air.
Dalam Kristian Allah itu bapa(pencipta)kami,bukannya Allah itu berbapa,dan bukan melahirkan melainkan mengambil bentuk,menjelma menjadi manusia dalam Jesus.

(TUN MENULIS)
11. Di Semenanjung Malaysia kita tidak pernah mendengar orang Kristian menggunakan kalimah "Allah" apabila bercakap berkenaan God dalam bahasa Melayu. Kenapa pula kita sekarang akan mengguna kalimah ini?

JAWAPAN SAYA:Kalimah "Allah"amat berleluasa digunakan diMalaysia Timur Sabah/Sarawak terutamanya sembayang hari minggu digereja-gereja yang gunakan bahasa Malaysia walaupun jarang kedengaran disemenanjung Malaysia.Disemenanjung Malaysia,majoriti Gerejanya ialah bersembayang dalam bahasa English,Chinese dan Tamil maka memang kalimah "Allah"jarang atau tidak disebut langsung kerana masyarakat Kristian hanyalah terdiri dari kaum cina dan India.Sejak zaman british,rakyat sabah/sarawak yang beragama Kristian menggunakan kalimah "Allah"dalam bahasa melayu tanpa ada kontroversi dan ini bukanlah baru dipraktekkan sekarang melainkan sudah ratusan tahun dipakai guna.

Saya kira bila agama dipolitikkan demi mencapai agenda masing2,sudah pastilah akan menimbulkan ketegangan.Saya harap pihak kerajaan akan berlaku adil memandang rakyat sabah/Sarawak telah buktikan sokongan padunya (99%)terhadap kerajaan BN dibandingkan dengan negeri lain.

Kepada majapil,

(TUN MENULIS)
9. Tetapi dalam agama Kristian terdapat konsep "Trinity" yang mana terdapat "God the Father, God the Son and the Holy Ghost". Jika dalam bahasa Melayu terdapat dalam kitab Injil atau syarahan berkenaan "Allah sebagai Bapak, Allah sebagai Anak dan Roh yang Suci", maka tentulah ini akan ditentang oleh orang Islam. Dalam Islam Allah tidak ada bapak, tidak ada anak. Ia tidak dilahirkan dan Ia tidak melahirkan sesiapa. Allah hanya satu. Ia tidak boleh disekutu dengan sesiapa.

SAYA MENJAWAP:Maaf TUN,pemahaman TUN tentang konsep "Trinity"atau "Tritunggal"tak dalam.Agama kristian tetap percaya Allah hanya SATU yang menyatakan diriNya dalam tiga oknum (Bapa,Anak dan Roh Kudus).Sama seperti manusia yg diciptakan menurut gambar dan rupa TUHAN .Manusia mempunyai (1)TUBUH (2) JIWA (3) ROH -manusia ialah mahkluk 'Tritunggal' TIGA DLM SATU sama seperti TUHAN ALLAH itu tritunggal (Bapa,Anak (Jesus) dan Roh Kudus).Contoh lain ialah AIR.Air hanya satu tetapi kandungan molikiulnya TIGA (H2O-2 Hidrogen dan 1 oksigen)untuk menjadi Air.
Dalam Kristian Allah itu bapa(pencipta)kami,bukannya Allah itu berbapa,dan bukan melahirkan melainkan mengambil bentuk,menjelma menjadi manusia dalam Jesus.

Inilah perbezaan yang jelas antara Muslim dengan Kristian.Makna Allah telah dijelaskan oleh Allah sendiri dalam surah Al-Ikhlas.Saudara telah tertinggal ayat ini ' Ia tidak boleh disekutu dengan sesiapa ' Dengan mengambil contoh 'air' terdiri dua unsur iaitu 2 Hidrogen dan 1 Oksigen telah menyamakan makhluk dengan Allah dan Allah itu ada sekutunya seperti hidrogen dan oksigen bersekutu baru boleh jadi air.Ini bertentangan dengan Islam kerana Allah tiada siapa yang menyerupainya dan tidak ada sekutu bagiNya.Allah tidak berkehendak pada makhluk tetapi makhluklah yang berkehendak kepadaNya.Tiada satu benda pun yang menyamai dan menyerupai Allah,tiada terfikir dan terlintas dihati manusia bagaimana rupa Allah.Allah Mahaberkuasa tidak perlu kepada sesiapa.Allah yang menjadikan Isa tanpa bapa seperti Adam tanpa bapa dan ibu, Hawa dijadikan daripada tulang rusuk Adam juga tanpa bapa dan ibu.
Adam dari tanah hitam yang kering dan keturunannya yang lain ,dari air mani sampai ke Isa , Ibunya Maryam mengandung tanpa disentuh lelaki dan lahirlah Isa.Inilah 4 kaedah lahirnya manusia ,3 daripadanya hanya khusus untuk Adam,Hawa dan Isa dan cara ke 4 itu percampuran benih lelaki dengan perempuan maka lahirlah keturunan manusia seperti anak-anak Adam dengan Hawa iaitu Qabil dan Habil.Di dalam Al-Quran semua nabi-nabi dari Adam,Nuh,Ibrahim,Luth,Ismail,Ishak,Yaakub,Yusuf,Syuaib,Musa,Daud,Sulaiman,Zakaria,Yahya,Isa dan nabi-nabi yang lain semuanya mengaku MUSLIM sebelum kedatangan nabi Muhammad dan kitab Al-Quran diturunkan.Agama nabi Ibrahim ialah Islam.Taurat,Zabur dan Injil diturankan selepas kewafatan Ibrahim.Al-Quran kepada Muhammad.
Pendustaan besar Kristian dan Yahudi yang mengatakan mereka mengikut agama dan Tuhan nabi Ibrahim.

RESPOND TO TUN MAHAFIRAUN'S WRITE-UP

ALLAH IS THE GOD FOR ALL MANKIND

Salamunalaykum Tun and others.

Malaysian Muslims thought that the word “ALLAH” is exclusive for them and it exclusively refers to the god of the Muslims. Whether the Malaysian Muslims like it or not, these are facts about the word ALLAH :-

1. Perkataan ALLAH digunakan juga oleh orang-orang yang menolak ajaran Nabi Muhammad [6:91].

2. Perkataan ALLAH digunakan juga oleh orang-orang Kristian Arab dari sebelum Nabi Muhammad sehinggalah sekarang. Kita boleh membaca sendiri secara online Arabic Bible ini dan lihat sendiri perkataan “ALLAH” ini yang ditulis di dalam tulisan Arab.

http://www.arabicbible.com/

3. Perkataan ALLAH digunakan juga oleh orang-orang Kristian Indonesia. Banyak program-program TV Kristian disiarkan di Indonesia sempena hari Natal. Kita boleh lihat pengunaan perkataan ALLAH di dalam program-program TV ini.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ft4Rp96jW0

3. ALLAH (di dalam bahasa Arab) = TUHAN (di dalam Bahasa Melayu) = GOD (di dalam bahasa English).

4. ALLAH bukannya nama khusus untuk tuhan orang-orang Islam. ALLAH adalah perkataan Arab bagi perkataan TUHAN. Sebab itulah orang-orang Arab yang menentang Nabi Muhammad [6:91] serta orang-orang Kristian Arab juga menggunakan perkataan ALLAH.

5. Penggunaan perkataan ALLAH bukanlah sesuatu yang eksklusif untuk orang-orang Islam sahaja. Sesiapa sahaja boleh menggunakan perkataan ALLAH. Pernah atau tidak Nabi Muhammad, Abu Bakar, Umar, Uthman dan Ali melarang orang-orang yang tidak mahu menerima Quran dan orang-orang Kristian Arab dari menggunakan perkataan ALLAH? Adakah kerajaan Mesir, kerajaan Iran serta kerajaan negara-negara Arab lain melarang rakyat mereka yang beragama Kristian daripada menggunakan perkataan ALLAH? Pernah atau tidak kerajaan Indonesia melarang rakyat mereka yg beragama Kristian daripada menggunakan perkataan ALLAH?

6. Memang benar perkataan “ALLAH” tidak terdapat di dalam kitab asal Taurat atau Injil kerana KITAB ASAL TAURAT DAN INJIL DITURUNKAN ATAU DITULIS DI DALAM BAHASA HEBREW DAN ARAMAIC, BUKANNYA DI DALAM BAHASA ARAB. Akan tetapi, perkataan “ALLAH” terdapat di dalam Old Testament dan New Testament yang telah diterjemahkan ke dalam Bahasa Arab. Perkataan “ALLAH” terdapat di dalam Quran kerana perkataan “ALLAH” ialah perkataan Arab dan Quran diturunkan atau ditulis didalam bahasa Arab. Orang-orang Kristian dan Yahudi yang bukan berbangsa Arab bertutur di dalam bahasa ibunda mereka sendiri dan mereka tidak menggunakan perkataan Arab "ALLAH" apabila mereka bertutur di dalam bahasa ibunda mereka, akan tetapi, perkataan "ALLAH" digunakan juga di dalam Quran apabila merujuk kepada pertuturan mereka. Ini adalah kerana Quran ditulis di dalam Bahasa Arab, oleh yang demikian perkataan Arab "ALLAH" (Arabic) digunakan bukannya "YAHWEH" (Hebrew) ataupun "ALAHA" (Aramaic). Contoh seperti di bawah :-

[6:91] THEY NEVER VALUE GOD AS HE SHOULD BE VALUED. Thus, THEY SAID, "GOD (ALLAH in Arabic text) does not reveal anything to any human being." Say, "Who then revealed the scripture that Moses brought, with light and guidance for the people?" You put it down on paper to proclaim it, while concealing a lot of it. You were taught what you never knew - you and your parents. Say, "GOD (is the One who revealed it)," then leave them in their heedlessness, playing.

[2:116] THEY (THE CHRISTIANS) SAID, "GOD (ALLAH in Arabic text) has begotten a son!" Be He glorified; never! To Him belongs everything in the heavens and the earth; all are subservient to Him.

[5:18] THE JEWS and the CHRISTIANS SAID, "We are GOD's (ALLAH in Arabic text) children and His beloved." Say, "Why then does He punish you for your sins? You are just humans like the other humans He created." He forgives whomever He wills and punishes whomever He wills. To ALLAH belongs the sovereignty of the heavens and the earth, and everything between them, and to Him is the final destiny.

[9:30] The JEWS said, "Ezra is the son of GOD (ALLAH in Arabic text)," while THE CHRISTIANS SAID, "Jesus is the son of GOD! (ALLAH in Arabic text)" These are blasphemies uttered by their mouths. They thus match the blasphemies of those who have disbelieved in the past. ALLAH condemns them. They have surely deviated.

[10:68] THEY (THE CHRISTIANS) SAID, "GOD (ALLAH in Arabic text) has begotten a son!" Be He glorified. He is the Most Rich. To Him belongs everything in the heavens and everything on earth. You have no proof to support such a blasphemy. Are you saying about GOD what you do not know?

God of the Arabic Bible is called "ALLAH". I do not think you believe that there is a god for the English Bible and another god for the Arabic Bible and a third for the Italian bible...etc. It would be too naive. There is only one GOD. His "name" in English is GOD, in French: UN DIEU, in Italian: DIO, in German: GOTT, in Spanish: DIOS, in Portuguese: DEUS, in Arabic: ALLAH, in Aramaic : ALAHA and in Malay : TUHAN.

All these are no more than the names of GOD in different languages. To this day the Christian Arabs pray to ALLAH and talk about ALLAH. They called Him ALLAH even before The Quran was revealed to Muhammad and they know they were not worshipping any moon god. Those who still speak Jesus language (Aramaic/syriac) call God ALAHA to this day like Jesus did. Jesus did not pray to a moon god but to ALAHA (ALLAH in Arabic), the One and Only God.

The Arabic Bible, use the word ALLAH for God.

If you want to verify it, call any Arabic church in the USA or any English speaking country and ask them what they call GOD in their Arabic Bible and whether they still use the word ALLAH in their Bible or not. You may even check it yourself from the online Arabic Bible.

Jewish Arabs also pray to ALLAH and talk about ALLAH just like an English person talks about GOD.

Apakah perasaan orang Islam apabila “God is dead” diganti dengan "Allah is dead"?

Bagaimanakah perasaan orang Islam apabila seseorang menyebut “God is dead”?

There is something wrong with the Muslims if they are sensitive when someone said “Allah is dead” but not sensitive when someone said “God is dead” as both have the same meaning and refer to the same GOD/TUHAN/ALLAH.

GOD bless.

WHEN SOME SAY "GOD IS DEAD" or "ALLAH IS DEAD" .... IS JUST THAT SOMETHING IS WRONG SOMEWHERE ..... FOR A TRUE BELIEVER IN GOD SHALL NEVER AND WILL NEVER UTTER THAT KIND OF PHRASE or UNBECOMING REMARKS.

BUT HOW CAN WE HUMANS SAY "GOD IS DEAD" or even "ALLAH IS DEAD" WHEN THOSE WHO BELIEVE IN GOD [ALLAH] SHOULD'VE KNOWN FULLY WELL THAT GOD [ALLAH] IS NEVER SIMILAR TO HIS CREATIONS .... AND GOD EXIST INFINITELY .....THUS GOD NEVER DIE - UNLIKE WE HUMANS (HIS CREATIONS) BORN TO LIVE AND DIE.

BEING A TRUE BELIEVER OF GOD [ALLAH] ..... EVERY HUMAN SHOULD KNOW THAT ONLY GOD [ALLAH] IS THE IMMORTAL ONE .... WHILE WE HUMANS OF HIS CREATIONS ARE JUST MERE MORTAL CREATURES OF GOD [ALLAH].

AND ONLY GOD THE ALMIGHTY - ALLAH.

A GOOD REPLY TO MARINA MAHATHIR'S OPINION

Muhammad Hazlami AKA Kumar said...

Salam,

I am a student from Singapore. I have been studying this issue closely from across the border, viewing it in many perspectives. However, it is unfortunate that I believe you are confused by the theological and historical aspect of the terminological use of Allah. To touch on the historical aspect of it, yes I do agree to your insightful historical review of the subject. However, clearly you must know that the context differs then and NOW. The context then, may I clarify, that Christians were called 'Ahlul Kitab', meaning the People of the Book. This is because at that moment there still exist few people who still follow the true teachings of Prophet Isa AS, and rejecting Trinity. That is the reason why Muhammad SAW mentioned about the marriage between them and Muslims, and their ability to carry out early Christian rituals that advocates monotheistic faith brought by Nabi Isa AS. However, in the context of the Present, you must know that Christianity itself has deviated far from the term 'Ahlul Kitab'. Thus, the context itself differs, and hence, we cannot use that as a proof to substantiate your support.

Theological wise, Allah is known by Malay Muslims as the One God, and not Trinity. Yes, you say about confident Muslims, and no one is interested in the clarity and understanding of it. That itself is a selfish claim undeniably. How can you compare your worldview with an illiterate fisherman who does not have the same intellectual capacity as you? We are talking about the worldview of Muslims, not yours as an individual. You must understand the context of 'ummah' as well.

It is less dangerous to know that you don't know (as syed farid al-attas says, people whom he categorises as cultural nominalists), but more dangerous for those who don't know that they don't know (liberal Muslims).

As the prophet SAW says, "Diam lebih baik daripada berkata."

This is to my understanding, a contextual affair for those who do not understand thoroughly a certain issue. Let us leave this issue to the theologians and ulamas who have the right authority. Wslm. :)

Friday, January 8, 2010

HARU BIRU BAHASA MELAYU BARU .....oooops BAHARU

KakiBakarJambantan berkata...

Contoh bahasa Melayu yg cukup sempurna...(CONTOH pun hanya SATU ni saja .... yg lain TARRAK pun) sepertimana di pergunakan oleh media2 tv kita especially RTM:

Penggunaan perkataan atau ungkapan 'BARU' di gantikan secara TERUS MENERUS, PERMANENT & COMPULSORY untuk kakitangan RTM ..... iaitu dari 'BARU' kpd 'BAHARU'.

AISEY ... BAHARU BAHARU INI AKU TAK SEMPAT MENGHADIRI UPACARA MENYAMBUT TAHUN BAHARU KERANA TERLALU SIBOK DGN HAL HAL DAN URUSAN PERSIAPAN MAJLIS PENGANTIN BAHARU ADIK AKU YANG AKAN BERLANGSUNG SEBELUM CUTI TAHUN BAHARU CINA NANTI .... WALAUBAGAIMANA PUN .... TIDAK TERLEWAT JIKA AKU UCAPKAN "SELAMAT TAHUN BAHARU" KEPADA ANDA ANDA SEMUA...... BAHARU LAH RASA LENGKAP DAN SEMPURNA HIDUP BILA KITA DAPAT MENYEMPURNAKAN AZAM BAHARU YANG DIBUAT MENJELANG SAMBUTAN TIAP2 TAHUN BAHARU.

Aku takut nanti bila tiap2 warga RTM dok sebut ungkapan 'BAHARU' untuk 'BARU' yang selalu dan lazim diguna .... NANTI JADI HARU BIRU pula. ......HARI HARI dok sebut baHARU baHARU .... lama lama jadi HARU puak2 warga RTM ..... pasai TERPAKSA IKUT ARAHAN puak2 atasan ..... MACAM ...... ucap selamat ...."SALAM SATU MALAYSIA" juga lah .......

2010 Januari 7 01:35

Thursday, January 7, 2010

MARINA MAHATHIR WRITES

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Confident People Do Not Get Confused

I found by chance this article the other day:

Prophet Muhammad’s Promise to Christians

The document is not a modern human rights treaty but even thought it was penned in 628 A.D. it clearly protects the right to property, freedom of religion, freedom of work, and security of the person, says Muqtedar Khan.

Muslims and Christians together constitute over fifty percent of the world and if they lived in peace, we will be half way to world peace. One small step that we can take towards fostering Muslim-Christian harmony is to tell and retell positive stories and abstain from mutual demonization.

In this article I propose to remind both Muslims and Christians about a promise that Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) made to Christians. The knowledge of this promise can have enormous impact on Muslim conduct towards Christians. Muslims generally respect the precedent of their Prophet and try to practice it in their lives.


In 628 AD, a delegation from St. Catherine’s Monastery came to Prophet Muhammed and requested his protection. He responded by granting them a charter of rights, which I reproduce below in its entirety. St. Catherine’s Monastery is located at the foot of Mt. Sinai and is the world’s oldest monastery. It possesses a huge collection of Christian manuscripts, second only to the Vatican, and is a world heritage site. It also boasts the oldest collection of Christian icons. It is a treasure house of Christian history that has remained safe for 1400 years under Muslim protection.


The Promise to St. Catherine:

"This is a message from Muhammad ibn Abdullah, as a covenant to those who adopt Christianity, near and far, we are with them.
Verily I, the servants, the helpers, and my followers defend them, because Christians are my citizens; and by God! I hold out against anything that displeases them.
No compulsion is to be on them. Neither are their judges to be removed from their jobs nor their monks from their monasteries. No one is to destroy a house of their religion, to damage it, or to carry anything from it to the Muslims' houses.
Should anyone take any of these, he would spoil God's covenant and disobey His Prophet. Verily, they are my allies and have my secure charter against all that they hate.
No one is to force them to travel or to oblige them to fight. The Muslims are to fight for them. If a female Christian is married to a Muslim, it is not to take place without her approval. She is not to be prevented from visiting her church to pray. Their churches are to be respected. They are neither to be prevented from repairing them nor the sacredness of their covenants.
No one of the nation (Muslims) is to disobey the covenant till the Last Day (end of the world)."

The first and the final sentence of the charter are critical. They make the promise eternal and universal. Muhammed asserts that Muslims are with Christians near and far straight away rejecting any future attempts to limit the promise to St. Catherine alone. By ordering Muslims to obey it until the Day of Judgment the charter again undermines any future attempts to revoke the privileges. These rights are inalienable. Muhammed declared Christians, all of them, as his allies and he equated ill treatment of Christians with violating God’s covenant.

A remarkable aspect of the charter is that it imposes no conditions on Christians for enjoying its privileges. It is enough that they are Christians. They are not required to alter their beliefs, they do not have to make any payments and they do not have any obligations. This is a charter of rights without any duties!

The document is not a modern human rights treaty but even thought it was penned in 628 A.D. it clearly protects the right to property, freedom of religion, freedom of work, and security of the person.

I know most readers, must be thinking so what? Well the answer is simple. Those who seek to foster discord among Muslims and Christians focus on issues that divide and emphasize areas of conflict. But when resources such as Muhammad’s promise to Christians are invoked and highlighted it builds bridges. It inspires Muslims to rise above communal intolerance and engenders good will in Christians who might be nursing fear of Islam or Muslims.

When I look at Islamic sources, I find in them unprecedented examples of religious tolerance and inclusiveness. They make me want to become a better person. I think the capacity to seek good and do good inheres in all of us. When we subdue this predisposition towards the good, we deny our fundamental humanity. In this holiday season, I hope all of us can find time to look for something positive and worthy of appreciation in the values, cultures and histories of other peoples.

Dr. Muqtedar Khan is Director of Islamic Studies at the University of Delaware and a fellow of the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now, when that delegation from St Catherine's monastery came to meet with Prophet Mohamad (pbuh), I suppose it's fair to assume that they spoke Arabic to one another. And when they were conversing, surely the word 'God' must have come up. As in "May God Be With You" and such like. What word did the Prophet (pbuh) use for 'God' I wonder? And what did the St Catherinians use in return? For monotheists like them, was there a 'your God' and 'my God' type of situation, or did they understand that they were both talking about the same One?



While some idiots are mourning over the 'loss' of the word 'Allah' and therefore basically telling the world that they are people easily confused by nomenclature, and others are predicting riots over what is basically a 'copyright' issue, let me define what I think a confident Muslim should be:


1. A confident Muslim is unfazed by the issue of God's name. God speaks to all of humankind in the Quran and never said that only Muslims could call him by the name Allah.


2. A confident Muslim has 99 names to choose from to describe that One God. My favourites are Ar-Rahman (The All-Compassionate) and Ar-Rahim (The All-Merciful).


3. A confident Muslim never gets confused over which is his/her religion and which is other people's. For instance, a confident Muslim knows exactly what the first chapter of the Quran is. And it's not the Lord's Prayer.


4. A confident Muslim will not walk into a church, hear a liturgy in Malay or Arabic where they use the word 'Allah' and then think that he or she is in a mosque. A confident Muslim knows the difference.


5. A confident Muslim is generous, inclusive and doesn't think that his or her brethren is made exclusive through the use of a single language. The confident Muslim is well aware that in the Middle East, all services of ANY religion are in Arabic because that's what they all speak.


6. A confident Muslim knows the basis of his/her faith are the five pillars of Islam and will not be shaken just because other people call God by the same name.


7. A Muslim believes in only One God. Therefore it makes sense that other people should call God by the same name because there is no other God.


ART THOU NOT aware that it is God whose limit­less glory all [creatures] that are in the heavens and on earth extol, even the birds as they spread out their wings?
Each [of them] knows indeed how to pray unto Him and to glorify Him; and God has full knowledge of all that they do:(
Surah Nour, Verse 41) (Asad)


So I would ask those people demonstrating against the Court decision, have you no pride? Are you saying you're easily confused?

And before anyone says I have no qualifications to say these things, read what Dr Asri Zainal Abidin (who does have qualifications no matter what JAIS says) has written about this very subject here.

And here's something interesting. In 2007, the Majlis Agama Negeri Perlis, which is a large majlis filled with people very learned in Islamic religious knowledge, discussed the question of the use of 'Allah' by non-Muslims. Their unanimous decision? They issued a fatwa to say that there is absolutely nothing wrong with non-Muslims using the word at all.(This was told to me by Dr. Asri but I cannot find the fatwa anywhere online because all the religious departments' websites are so useless.)

Are we now going to excommunicate the whole of Perlis?



Wednesday, January 6, 2010

WHAT MARINA MAHATHIR DID SAY

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Confident People Do Not Get Confused

I found by chance this article the other day:

Prophet Muhammad’s Promise to Christians

The document is not a modern human rights treaty but even thought it was penned in 628 A.D. it clearly protects the right to property, freedom of religion, freedom of work, and security of the person, says Muqtedar Khan.

Muslims and Christians together constitute over fifty percent of the world and if they lived in peace, we will be half way to world peace. One small step that we can take towards fostering Muslim-Christian harmony is to tell and retell positive stories and abstain from mutual demonization.

In this article I propose to remind both Muslims and Christians about a promise that Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) made to Christians. The knowledge of this promise can have enormous impact on Muslim conduct towards Christians. Muslims generally respect the precedent of their Prophet and try to practice it in their lives.


In 628 AD, a delegation from St. Catherine’s Monastery came to Prophet Muhammed and requested his protection. He responded by granting them a charter of rights, which I reproduce below in its entirety. St. Catherine’s Monastery is located at the foot of Mt. Sinai and is the world’s oldest monastery. It possesses a huge collection of Christian manuscripts, second only to the Vatican, and is a world heritage site. It also boasts the oldest collection of Christian icons. It is a treasure house of Christian history that has remained safe for 1400 years under Muslim protection.


The Promise to St. Catherine:

"This is a message from Muhammad ibn Abdullah, as a covenant to those who adopt Christianity, near and far, we are with them.
Verily I, the servants, the helpers, and my followers defend them, because Christians are my citizens; and by God! I hold out against anything that displeases them.
No compulsion is to be on them. Neither are their judges to be removed from their jobs nor their monks from their monasteries. No one is to destroy a house of their religion, to damage it, or to carry anything from it to the Muslims' houses.
Should anyone take any of these, he would spoil God's covenant and disobey His Prophet. Verily, they are my allies and have my secure charter against all that they hate.
No one is to force them to travel or to oblige them to fight. The Muslims are to fight for them. If a female Christian is married to a Muslim, it is not to take place without her approval. She is not to be prevented from visiting her church to pray. Their churches are to be respected. They are neither to be prevented from repairing them nor the sacredness of their covenants.
No one of the nation (Muslims) is to disobey the covenant till the Last Day (end of the world)."

The first and the final sentence of the charter are critical. They make the promise eternal and universal. Muhammed asserts that Muslims are with Christians near and far straight away rejecting any future attempts to limit the promise to St. Catherine alone. By ordering Muslims to obey it until the Day of Judgment the charter again undermines any future attempts to revoke the privileges. These rights are inalienable. Muhammed declared Christians, all of them, as his allies and he equated ill treatment of Christians with violating God’s covenant.

A remarkable aspect of the charter is that it imposes no conditions on Christians for enjoying its privileges. It is enough that they are Christians. They are not required to alter their beliefs, they do not have to make any payments and they do not have any obligations. This is a charter of rights without any duties!

The document is not a modern human rights treaty but even thought it was penned in 628 A.D. it clearly protects the right to property, freedom of religion, freedom of work, and security of the person.

I know most readers, must be thinking so what? Well the answer is simple. Those who seek to foster discord among Muslims and Christians focus on issues that divide and emphasize areas of conflict. But when resources such as Muhammad’s promise to Christians are invoked and highlighted it builds bridges. It inspires Muslims to rise above communal intolerance and engenders good will in Christians who might be nursing fear of Islam or Muslims.

When I look at Islamic sources, I find in them unprecedented examples of religious tolerance and inclusiveness. They make me want to become a better person. I think the capacity to seek good and do good inheres in all of us. When we subdue this predisposition towards the good, we deny our fundamental humanity. In this holiday season, I hope all of us can find time to look for something positive and worthy of appreciation in the values, cultures and histories of other peoples.

Dr. Muqtedar Khan is Director of Islamic Studies at the University of Delaware and a fellow of the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now, when that delegation from St Catherine's monastery came to meet with Prophet Mohamad (pbuh), I suppose it's fair to assume that they spoke Arabic to one another. And when they were conversing, surely the word 'God' must have come up. As in "May God Be With You" and such like. What word did the Prophet (pbuh) use for 'God' I wonder? And what did the St Catherinians use in return? For monotheists like them, was there a 'your God' and 'my God' type of situation, or did they understand that they were both talking about the same One?



While some idiots are mourning over the 'loss' of the word 'Allah' and therefore basically telling the world that they are people easily confused by nomenclature, and others are predicting riots over what is basically a 'copyright' issue, let me define what I think a confident Muslim should be:


1. A confident Muslim is unfazed by the issue of God's name. God speaks to all of humankind in the Quran and never said that only Muslims could call him by the name Allah.


2. A confident Muslim has 99 names to choose from to describe that One God. My favourites are Ar-Rahman (The All-Compassionate) and Ar-Rahim (The All-Merciful).


3. A confident Muslim never gets confused over which is his/her religion and which is other people's. For instance, a confident Muslim knows exactly what the first chapter of the Quran is. And it's not the Lord's Prayer.


4. A confident Muslim will not walk into a church, hear a liturgy in Malay or Arabic where they use the word 'Allah' and then think that he or she is in a mosque. A confident Muslim knows the difference.


5. A confident Muslim is generous, inclusive and doesn't think that his or her brethren is made exclusive through the use of a single language. The confident Muslim is well aware that in the Middle East, all services of ANY religion are in Arabic because that's what they all speak.


6. A confident Muslim knows the basis of his/her faith are the five pillars of Islam and will not be shaken just because other people call God by the same name.


7. A Muslim believes in only One God. Therefore it makes sense that other people should call God by the same name because there is no other God.


ART THOU NOT aware that it is God whose limit­less glory all [creatures] that are in the heavens and on earth extol, even the birds as they spread out their wings?

Each [of them] knows indeed how to pray unto Him and to glorify Him; and God has full knowledge of all that they do:(
Surah Nour, Verse 41) (Asad)


So I would ask those people demonstrating against the Court decision, have you no pride? Are you saying you're easily confused?

And before anyone says I have no qualifications to say these things, read what Dr Asri Zainal Abidin (who does have qualifications no matter what JAIS says) has written about this very subject here.

And here's something interesting. In 2007, the Majlis Agama Negeri Perlis, which is a large majlis filled with people very learned in Islamic religious knowledge, discussed the question of the use of 'Allah' by non-Muslims. Their unanimous decision? They issued a fatwa to say that there is absolutely nothing wrong with non-Muslims using the word at all.(This was told to me by Dr. Asri but I cannot find the fatwa anywhere online because all the religious departments' websites are so useless.)

Are we now going to excommunicate the whole of Perlis?